全国首例艾滋携带者告保险公司“歧视”败诉
2009-07-09 20:24:00 来源: 昆明信息港(昆明)
昆明信息港讯记者谢思思今天(9日)上午,记者在艾滋病感染者诉讼**保险公司一案新闻发布会商获悉,全国首个艾滋携带者告保险公司“歧视”败诉,7月7日,原告李伟正式向昆明市中级人民法院提出上诉。
2008年,李伟成为全国首个告保险公司“歧视”的艾滋病携带者。官司持续了近两年,“一审判决作为原告方的我败诉。”李伟(化名)是一名艾滋病毒携带者,一审败诉的他通过律师发表了一封公开信,“我是一名普通的投保人,同时也是一名艾滋病病毒携带者,如果按照我购买的这份交通意外伤害保险合同条款,我自始至终都无法享有购买保险应取得的合法权益……这是赤裸裸的、制度性的歧视,我希望在不久的将来,我们能够得到一份公平的保险合同,得到一个平等的社会环境,作为一个正常人去工作、生活……”
今年7月7日,李伟正式向昆明市中级人民法院提出上诉。
艾滋携带者:告保险公司歧视败诉
2008年2月4日,李伟向某知名保险公司购买了两张意外险卡。同日,保险公司激活了李伟所购买的意外险卡,保单上记载:被保险人李伟,保险期为2008年2月5日零时至2009年2月4日24时。所获保障为:交通意外保险额:飞机200000元,火车、轮船50000元,汽车30000元,非交通意外保险额:25000元;意外医疗保险额:2500元。之后,李伟无意中发现保险条款里的一条免责条款写有“被保险人患艾滋病(AIDS)或感染艾滋病毒(HIV呈阳性)期间,本公司不负给付保险责任……”。李伟的心当即被“刺”了一下,手中薄薄几张保单一下子变得很重很重。李伟认为该条款有着“明显的歧视”,本是想着为自己、为家人买一份放心,可是这样的权利不属于他。2008年5月,李伟委托云南上义律师事务所汤荣和周大勇律师,将保险公司告上法庭,要求法院判令该免责条款无效;并删除相应带有歧视性质的保险合同条款,并索赔10元的精神损害抚慰金。2008年8月28日,昆明市五华区法院不公开审理了关于艾滋病病毒感染者诉保险公司一案。李伟在诉状上称,将“患艾滋病或感染艾滋病毒期间”与战争、军事行动、暴乱、武装叛乱及核辐射等并列作为免责条件之一,明显具有对艾滋病患者和艾滋病毒携带者的歧视,违反了人生而平等的原则和不得歧视艾滋病患者和艾滋病毒携带者的相关规定。
是否属于对艾滋病人的歧视条款?
庭审中,保险公司表示:保险公司的保险条款及内容均符合国家规定并报保监会备案,李伟所购买的团体意外伤害保险系1998年经保监会正式批准后销售的,保险公司的保险条款及内容并不存在对艾滋病患者或艾滋病毒携带者的歧视,将艾滋病与战争暴乱并列,而这些情况都是比较普通的,而并非歧视艾滋病患者。云南上义律师事务所汤荣律师认为:艾滋病既不是传播最迅速的疾病,也不是医疗费用最高的疾病,国家投入了大量的人力物力对艾滋病患者进行抗病毒治疗。但是目前,社会上对艾滋病的认识还停留在技术层面,很少有人关注到他们的公民权利和平等的诉求。《艾滋病防治条例》的规定过于笼统,缺乏可操作性,没有对‘歧视’的概念进行明确界定,更没有对歧视行为的法律责任和救济途径加以明确。
五华区法院审理后,用“外来、剧烈、意外”六个字,概括了造成意外伤害的灾害事故的3大要素。认为因患艾滋病或艾滋病毒携带者造成被保险人身故、残疾或医疗费用支出,系被保险人身体内在的原因造成的伤害,显然并不属于意外伤害保险中的灾害事故。保险公司在意外伤害保险条款中,将被保险人患艾滋病或感染艾滋病毒与其他同样不具备“外来、剧烈、意外”三大要素的事故情形,作为不承担保险责任的情形一并进行列举,是为了进一步界定意外伤害保险所承保的灾害事故的特定范围,从其文字含义和内在原理中,并未表现出对艾滋病人或艾滋病携带者的人格歧视。
据此,李伟的诉讼请求被驳回。
李伟认为:“既然是意外伤害,就是不特定的,不由自身病情决定的。这样的判决依然无法让人信服。”据悉,7月7日,李伟已正式向昆明市中级人民法院提出上诉。
社会人士:给每个生命一份保险
亚太艾滋病服务机构委员会的夏东华认为,歧视性保险条款不仅仅是把70万艾滋病感染者拒之门外,他们拒绝的是70万个家庭。“天上掉下的瓶子不可能专门砸到艾滋病感染者,意外伤害与感染艾滋没有任何的关系。”给每个生命一份保险,平等地对待他们,也为自己的生活降低了一份风险。艾滋病病人和病毒感染者采取法律途径维护自身合法权益,是值得倡导的。
(本文来源:昆明信息港 )
HIV carriers in the country's first insurance companies were "discrimination" against
2009-07-09 20:24:00 Source: Information Kunming (Kunming)
Kunming Information谢思思hearing reporters today (9) morning, the reporter AIDS ** insurance litigation case to the press conference was informed that the National HIV carriers were the first insurance company "discrimination" against, July 7, Li Wei, an official to the plaintiff Kunming Intermediate People's Court of Appeal.
2008 National李伟成the first insurance companies were "discrimination" of people living with AIDS. Lawsuit going on for almost two years, the "court as plaintiffs against me." Wei (a pseudonym) is an HIV-positive, in the first instance, he lost through his lawyer issued an open letter, "I am an ordinary policyholders, but also an AIDS virus carriers, if I purchased in accordance with the traffic accident injury insurance terms of the contract, from the beginning, I can not take out insurance cover for the enjoyment of the legitimate rights and interests should be made ... ... This is the stark, institutional discrimination, I hope that in the near future, we can get a fair insurance contract will have an equal social environment to work as a normal life ... ... "
July 7 this year, Li Wei, an official to the Kunming Intermediate People's Court of Appeal.
People living with HIV: Discrimination against insurance companies were
February 4, 2008, Li Wei, a well-known insurance companies to buy accident insurance card 2. The same day, Li Wei, activated by the insurance company to buy accident insurance cards, insurance policies on the record: Li Wei, the insured, the insurance period is at 0:00 on February 5, 2008 to February 4, 2009, when 24. For the protection of: the amount of traffic accident insurance: 200,000 yuan aircraft, trains, ships 50,000, 30,000 motor vehicles, non-traffic accident insurance amount: 25,000; accident medical insurance amount: 2,500 yuan. After Li Wei, inadvertently discovered a clause in the insurance policy in the exemption clause that read, "the insured person suffering from AIDS (AIDS) or infected with HIV (HIV positive), the payment of the insurance company, the responsibility ... ...." Li Wei's heart immediately, "thorn" a little, thin hands of a few policies suddenly become very heavy. Li Wei believes that the provision has a "clear discrimination", this is the thinking for themselves and for their families to buy a copy of ease, but such rights do not belong to him. May 2008, Li Wei, Yunnan commissioned汤荣on justice and law firm lawyers周大勇to insurance companies to court, asking the court to order that the exemption clause is invalid; and delete the discriminatory nature of the corresponding terms of the contract of insurance, and the spirit of the claims 10 solatium damages. August 28, 2008, Kunming五华区Court is not a public hearing on the HIV case against the insurance company. Li Wei, said in the complaint will be "suffering from AIDS or infected with HIV during the" war, military action, riots, armed rebellion and nuclear radiation, such as one of the conditions for a tie as a defense, obviously on AIDS and the discrimination of people living with HIV , born in violation of the principle of equality and non-discrimination against AIDS patients and HIV carriers in the relevant provisions.
Whether it is discrimination on the terms of AIDS?
Court trial, the insurance company, said: insurance insurance companies are in line with the terms and contents of the China Insurance Regulatory Commission reported to the state record, and Li Wei, the group purchased Accident Insurance Department in 1998 after formal approval by the China Insurance Regulatory Commission sales, insurance companies Terms and contents insurance does not exist in patients with AIDS or discrimination of people living with HIV, AIDS and war, riots will be side by side, and these cases are relatively common, and not discriminating against AIDS. Yunnan汤荣the law firm lawyers just that: AIDS is neither a disease spread most rapidly, nor is it the highest medical costs of disease, the state invested a great deal of manpower and material resources for AIDS patients with antiretroviral therapy. However, the community's awareness of AIDS remains at the technical level, very few people are concerned that their civil rights and equality demands. "AIDS prevention and control regulations," the provisions are too general, lack of interoperability, not to 'discrimination' to clearly define the concept, but no legal responsibility for acts of discrimination and relief to be a clear way.
五华区court, the use of "external, violent, accidental," the six words, a summary of the disasters caused by accidental injury of the 3 major factor in the accident. That due to people living with HIV or AIDS caused the death of the insured person, disability or medical expenses, personal insurance department has been the reason in the body caused by injury, is clearly not part of accidental injuries in the accident insurance. Insurance companies in terms of accident insurance, the insured person will be suffering from AIDS or infected with HIV do not have the same with other "external, violent, accidental," the three elements of the accident situation, as insurance does not assume responsibility for the situation listed together, was to further define the Accident Insurance underwritten by a specific range of disasters, from its intrinsic meaning and principles of the text does not show people living with AIDS or AIDS discrimination personality.
Accordingly, Li Wei of the proceedings was denied.
Li Wei, said: "Since it is accidental injury, is not specific, not their own decision condition. This verdict is still not convincing." It is learned that the July 7, Li Wei has formally proposed to the Kunming Intermediate People's Court of Appeal .
The community: an insurance policy for each life
Asia-Pacific AIDS service organizations in the summer of the Tung Wah Group of the Committee believe that the discriminatory clause in the insurance policy is not just the 700,000 AIDS out, is that they refuse to 700,000 families. "Can not come knocking on the door of the bottles hit the specialized AIDS, unintentional injuries and infected with HIV there is no relationship." To each of the lives of an insurance policy, equal treatment of them for their own lives to reduce a risk. AIDS patients and HIV-infected persons to take legal means to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests should be advocated.
(This article Source: Kunming Information)
|