国际资助:咫尺,还是天涯?
http://www.sina.com.cn 2009年01月13日 16:35 《科学新闻》杂志
争取国际科研项目,更大的价值在于学习科学的创新型思维方式
-记者 卢家兴 实习记者 陈丹
“获得国际资助的重要意义在于,中国科学家能与世界顶尖科学家站在同一起跑线上竞争。”近日,中国疾病预防控制中心艾滋病首席专家邵一鸣对《科学新闻》记者说。
国际科研资助
罕见中国面孔
复旦大学高谦和香港大学陈志伟的研究计划日前分别获得了比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会“探索大挑战”计划的资助,在首批104个获资助项目中,只有这两个项目来自中国。
据盖茨基金会的人员透露,这次来自中国科学家的申请书总数为117份。盖茨基金会驻华首席代表叶雷指出,“探索大挑战”本身是个关于探索创新的比赛,而大多数来自中国的申请并没有满足要求,就是因为它们希望得到资助来支持已经存在的概念或证据。
身兼盖茨基金会全球重大卫生挑战科学委员会委员职务的邵一鸣说:“不仅(申请盖茨基金)如此,中国科学家获得其他国际资助的比率也比较低。”
邵一鸣不仅是国家“863”等计划中艾滋病研究课题的负责人,在许多国家重点课题中领衔,而且凭借着对国情与国际前沿科技信息的熟悉掌握,他带领的团队争取到众多的国际课题,与欧盟、世界卫生组织、世界艾滋病基金会、美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)等进行了广泛的科研合作。其中,他牵头在NIH拿到的几项课题,加在一起的经费达到2000多万美元。
在申请国外科研资助方面经验老到的邵一鸣看来,国际间的科学合作研究实际上逐年都在扩大。以传染病研究领域为例,很多传染病欧美国家没有足够的病例资源,他们主动开放对发展中国家的合作研究,要求本国科学家要与当地科学家一起申请项目。
尽管国际科研资助的开放程度越来越高,科研合作机会亦越来越多,但是发展中国家科学家获得国际资助的比率依然偏低,没有等比率的提升。
“这不仅仅是中国的问题,也是整个发展中国家都面临的问题。必须承认,发展中国家的整体科研水平仍然不高。申请国际资助时,中国与国外科学家同台竞争,实力决定了胜负。”邵一鸣说。
科学价值是
资助的唯一标准
中国科学家在国际科研资助方面的失意,除了由于科研水平尚有差距外,还有诸多因素需要与国际接轨。
第一点就是语言关。英语不是中国人的母语,“一份好的申请书必须文字流畅、结构合理、语法正确,容易被同行专家理解和看懂”,邵一鸣说。
其次,要严格遵循项目指南来撰写申请书。根据邵一鸣的经验,申请书长度和格式往往是败阵的罪魁。许多基金机构会最先筛选剔除那些不遵循项目指南的申请书,以节省项目评审时间和资金。即使勉强送审,那些缺乏科学假设或研究方案设计不严谨的申请都不会得高分。另外,文字表述生硬或讨论欠妥的申请书也会使评审者没兴趣阅读,产生负面影响。
申请国外资助是一件非常辛苦的活儿,需要科学家把所有精力都投入其中。此外,还要资讯通达,了解国际上主要资助机构和计划,不要错过申请时机;了解资助机构的评审规则和评审思路等。
“不过,尽管国际课题申请很有挑战性,但只是拼科学,因而较单纯,决定因素是有无创新性及科学价值和研究方案的可行性。”邵一鸣补充说。
他认为,这点与在中国申请课题有所不同,因为后者除科学性外,还受人情和其他因素的影响,因而更累人。调查显示,国内申请时很多科学家在递交申请书后,还要花时间去“走关系”。
这种情况在国外是绝对不可以的。“国外的科研资助评审只有一个标准,那就是科学。”邵一鸣说。
例如,世界上最大的资助机构NIH执行二级评审制度,第一步由相应领域的科学评审小组对申请书的科学性和技术问题进行审核;第二步是通过一审的申请书送交NIH各研究所或研究中心的国家顾问委员会再次全面审核。
在这种评审制度下,“走关系”是不可能的。邵一鸣介绍说,一旦发现作弊,申请人将被永远“封杀”,这也使人轻易不敢越雷池半步。
邵一鸣观察到,近年来中国政府科技部门越来越关注科技评审的科学性和公正性,将之作为科技管理体制和机制创新的重要任务,他希望这一改革目标能尽快实现,使中国科技队伍在拼科学的环境中成长壮大,因为这是胜任国际科技竞争的基本保证。
创新是
国际科学研究的灵魂
“中国的每一份科研申请书都必须回答这样一个问题:国外研究进展如何。如果国外没有相关研究,很容易因为立项依据不足被否决。”邵一鸣认为这是主动画地为牢的行为。
记者在网上找到的国家重点基础研究发展计划“973”项目申请书编写提纲证实了这一点:第二条需要填写的是国内外研究现状和发展趋势。“863”计划项目申请表亦然。
邵一鸣说:“创新是国际科学研究的灵魂,模仿性研究是很难拿到资助的。”
这次“探索大挑战”计划就以颠覆传统的、不需任何前期工作积累的方式表达了对于创新的渴求。同时申请书也只需写两页纸。
盖茨基金会这种突破常规的做法深得邵一鸣的认同:“科学不能过于循规蹈矩,甚至要鼓励‘异想天开’和‘胡思乱想’。”他强调,成功的科学家一定要想前人所未想,做前人所未做。例如大家都知道微波是通讯手段,但是有个科学家突发奇想,提出用微波热效应来做饭,这就完全跳出了原来的框框,用另一种全新的视角来看待微波的应用。“沿着一条从未有人走过的路往前走,即便是失败,至少也能让后来人的探索免走弯路。”
“争取国际科研项目,更大的价值在于学习科学的创新型思维方式。”邵一鸣说。
01 years http://www.sina.com.cn 2009 day 16:35 on 13, "Science News" magazine
For international research projects, greater value lies in the study of science and innovative way of thinking
- Reporter Lu Jiaxing internship reporter Chen Dan
"Access to international funding the significance lies in the fact that Chinese scientists to work with the world's top scientists to compete on the same starting line." Recently, the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention AIDS Shao Yiming, chief expert of "Science News", told reporters.
International research funding
China faces a rare
Fudan University, the University of Hong Kong high Zhiwei modest research project recently won the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation "to explore big challenge" of projects that, in the first batch of 104 approved projects, only these two items from China.
According to the Gates Foundation's staff revealed that the scientists from China, a total of 117 applications. Gates Foundation Chief Representative in China Ye Lei pointed out that the "great challenge to explore" itself is about to explore new and innovative games, the majority of applications from China did not meet the requirements, that is because they want to receive funding to support the concept that already exists or evidence.
Gates Foundation, who is also the world's major health challenges of the Scientific Committee and member of the Shao Yiming said: "Not only (to apply for the Gates Foundation) so that Chinese scientists have access to other international funding ratio is relatively low."
Shao Yiming is not only a national "863" plan, such as AIDS research people in charge of important subjects in many countries in the lead, but by virtue of the nation and the international forefront of scientific and technical information as well as familiarity with, he led the team to win a large number of international issues, with the European Union, the World Health Organization, the World AIDS Foundation, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) to carry out a wide range of scientific research cooperation. Among them, the NIH to get him to take the lead in a number of issues, the funding together to achieve more than 2000 million.
In the application of foreign R & D funding experienced Shao Yiming, the international study on scientific cooperation is expanding year by year. To infectious disease research as an example, many infectious diseases in Europe and America do not have enough resources cases, they opened up their collaborative research in developing countries require their scientists to work together with local scientists to apply for the project.
Although the international research funding is becoming more open, scientific research is also more and more opportunities for cooperation, but scientists from developing countries access to international funding ratio is still low, there is no such ratio improved.
"This is not just China's problem, but also throughout the developing countries are facing problems. It must be recognized that the overall level of scientific research in developing countries is still not high. To apply for international funding, the Chinese and foreign scientists, the same competition, the strength of wins decision negative. "said Shao Yiming.
Scientific value is
The sole criterion for funding
Chinese scientists in international research funding frustrated, in addition to the level of scientific research as a result there are gaps, there are many factors that need to align with the international community.
The first point is language related. English is not the mother tongue of the Chinese people, "a good application must text smooth, rational structure, grammar is correct, easily understood and to understand peer," said Shao Yiming.
Secondly, we must strictly follow the guidelines to write applications for the project. According to Shao Yiming experience, length and format of the application is often the culprit defeated. Many funding agencies will be the first to remove those who do not adhere to screening guidelines for the application of the project in order to save time and money the project assessment. Even if some sort of trial, those assumptions or lack of scientific research program design is not a strict application will not get high marks. In addition, the textual representation of blunt or discussion defective assessment of those applications will also not interested in reading, have a negative impact.
To apply for funds from abroad is a very hard work, all the energy needs of scientists are injecting them. In addition, information access, understanding of the major international funding agencies and programs, do not miss the opportunity to apply; understanding of funding bodies to make assessments, such as rules and assessment of ideas.
"However, despite the application of international issues is very challenging, but only hard science, and therefore more simple determining factor is the availability of innovative and scientific value and the feasibility study." Shao Yiming added.
In his view, this point in China to apply for different subjects, which in addition to the scientific nature, but also by human and other factors, and therefore more tiring. Survey shows that domestic applications, many scientists to submit their applications, but also to spend time to "take the relationship."
This situation is abroad, absolutely impossible. "Foreign-funded assessment of the scientific research that there is only one standard, and that is science." Said Shao Yiming.
For example, the world's largest implementation of two NIH-funded organizations accreditation system, the first step by the corresponding area of the application of scientific assessment panel of scientific and technical issues for review; the second step is the first instance the application to the NIH research or the State Research Center Advisory Board once again a full assessment.
In this assessment system, "Let's relationship" is impossible. Shao Yiming, said if it is found cheating, the applicant will be Forever "ban", which is easily dare not deviate from them.
Shao Yiming observed that the Chinese government science and technology sector in recent years become increasingly concerned about the scientific and technological assessment of scientific and impartiality, as science and technology management system and mechanism innovation in an important task, and he hoped that the realization of the objectives of the reform as soon as possible so that the ranks of the China Science and Technology In hard science and environment to grow, because this is the competent international scientific and technological competition in the basic guarantee.
Innovation is the
The soul of the international scientific research
"China's scientific research each application must answer the question: What progress has been made overseas study. If there is no relevant studies abroad, it is easy because the project was rejected based on insufficient." Shao Yiming think this is the initiative画地为牢behavior.
Reporters find online National Key Basic Research Development Project "973" project to prepare an outline application to prove this point: the second is at home and abroad are required to complete research and development trends. "863" project so the application form.