|
因被误诊为艾滋病感染者两年半，西安市民冯战强将报告出具单位——陕西省疾病预防控制中心告上法庭。昨日，该案在碑林区法院开庭审理。
为何起诉
家住西安市莲湖区的冯战强2006年在西安市劳教所劳教时被抽血，被误诊为艾滋病感染者。
被误诊，当了两年艾滋病感染者
2009年2月，省疾控中心向冯战强出具一份材料，称“分析冯战强第一份血样经多种试剂、多家单位初筛、确认均为阳性的情况，我中心认为此份血样受污染而错判的可能性大。”“对此，三级疾控系统对冯战强致歉。”
因为省疾控中心先后出具了两份结论完全相反的确认报告，近日，冯战强把省疾控中心告上法庭。
冯战强索赔近14万元
昨日上午的庭审中，冯战强说，2006年被查出是艾滋病感染者后，吓坏了全家人，周围不少人知道后，“像躲瘟疫一样躲着我”。他要求恢复名誉、消除影响、赔礼道歉，并赔偿各种损失近14万元。
省疾控中心辩称无过错
2006年“HIV抗体”呈阳性，2008年又呈阴性，问题出在哪里呢?省疾控中心称存在以下可能：冯战强的血清样本被“张冠李戴”;样本被污染;不为现在医学所知的原因使其HIV抗体由阳性转为阴性。“但无论上述哪种情况，都不能证明省疾控中心有过错。”省疾控中心答辩称，确认工作是对送检标本HIV抗体呈阳性的结论正确与否进行判断，而不直接与被采样者接触;确认报告仅对送检血样负责，而艾滋病确诊从血样采集、初筛、复检、确诊、网报整个过程牵涉多家机构。
为何撤诉
由于误诊过程牵涉多家机构，原告准备撤诉后，将重新起诉省、市、区三级疾控。
昨日下午，冯战强告诉记者，将重新起诉省市区三级疾控中心，要把误诊的责任搞清楚。本报记者 宁军 李琳 实习生 刘芷妍
编辑:梁铮 来源:华商网-华商报 2009-04-16 03:11
Misdiagnosed cases of AIDS trial plaintiff claims dropped to 140,000 For the prosecution
http://news.hsw.cn Source:华商网- 2009-04-16 03:11 China Daily
Was misdiagnosed as a result of AIDS two and a half years, Xian Feng war forced the public report issued units - Shaanxi Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention to court. Yesterday, the case in the trial court碑林区.
Why is the prosecution
Lianhu District, who lives in Xi'an Zhan-Qiang Feng in Xi'an in 2006 when blood re-education camp, was misdiagnosed as AIDS.
Be mistaken, when a two-year AIDS
In February 2009, the provincial CDC to issue a Zhanqiang Mr materials, hereinafter referred to as "analysis of Mr Zhanqiang first blood by a variety of reagents, a number of screening units, are confirmed positive, I think the center of the contaminated blood and the possibility of a miscarriage of justice. "" In this regard, the three-tier system of disease control apologize Zhanqiang Feng. "
CDC has issued since the province of two diametrically opposed conclusions confirm the report, recently, Mr Zhanqiang provincial CDC to court.
Mr Zhanqiang claim nearly 140,000 yuan
Yesterday morning's hearing, Mr Strong said the war in 2006, was found to be infected with AIDS, the terrified family, surrounded by a lot of people know, the "avoided like the plague to hide me." He called for the restoration of reputation, to eliminate the impact of an apology and compensation for loss of almost all kinds of 140,000 yuan.
Provincial CDC argues that the no-fault
2006 "HIV antibodies" positive and negative in 2008, the problem went wrong? CDC said the province may be the following: Mr Zhanqiang serum samples were "张冠李戴"; samples from being contaminated; not now known medical the reasons for antibodies to HIV-positive to negative from. "But no matter what the situation above, we can not prove that the provincial CDC fault." Provincial CDC said in reply, confirmed the work of inspection samples of HIV-positive judge the correctness of the conclusions, rather than directly with sampling access; only submitted blood samples to confirm the report, and the diagnosis of AIDS from the blood collection, screening, examination, diagnosis, network reported that a number of agencies involved in the whole process.
Why is dropped
Misdiagnosis due to a number of agencies involved in the process, the plaintiff prepared to drop, it will re-prosecution of provinces, municipalities, and three disease control area.
Yesterday afternoon, Feng Zhan-Qiang told reporters that the prosecution will be the three provinces, municipalities, and CDC, it is necessary to clarify the responsibility of misdiagnosis. Reporter intern刘芷NING Jun Li Yan
Editor:梁铮Source:华商网- 2009-04-16 03:11 China Daily
[1]
|
