|
李吉明：教师无“性趣”，性教育哪里来？
2011-05-15 12:54 凤凰网
日前，在由《中国性科学》杂志主办性科学大讲堂上披露的一项调查显示，有近一半教师并不清楚，对于学龄儿童而言，进行性教育的主要责任在学校；一些中小学老师对于性教育的内容很模糊，用生理知识教育代替异性交往、性心理辅导；如何预防性侵害，对性病、艾滋病的预防等性安全教育也严重缺乏，还有老师不知道健康文明的性观念和性道德包括哪些内容。91.2%的中小学教师认为自己所具备的知识不够用，在进行性教育时做不到坦率、大方、自然，缺乏教育方法。（《北京晚报》2011年05月13日）
设若说学校是性教育的主要阵地、教师是性教育的主要力量，恐怕没有人会提出反对意见。但性教育却又是一个极为复杂的社会课题，教师又岂能堪负如此大任？别的暂且不说，笔者只想反问一个问题：教师不是性学专家，他们的性知识又从哪里来？
众所周知，性教育是涉及心理、历史、文化、人类学、宗教、伦理、法律等多学科知识一门学问，对教师要求极高。而对于中国的教师来说，却又往往因为“学高为师、身正为范”的要求而导致其素来具有“师表”的天性，从而把关乎“性”的话题看作洪水猛兽，既不敢超越雷池一步，也羞于谈“性”论“色”，再加之没有统一的教材，因而也就只能由心理教师、生物教师或校医来敷衍一番了。
可以肯定地说，教师性知识的多寡与优劣，直接决定了学校性教育的成败。而事实上却是，中国的教师只不过是所谓知识的传播器而已，更多的教师则成为了考试分数的播种机和助动机。他们早已习惯了拿时间来消耗学生的生命，用生硬的语言来助推分数的攀升，甚至早已脱离了尘世的繁杂而“神圣”得不可一世，从而变得机械、呆板，教条、僵化，更不要说什么性的体验和性的研究了。我们很难想象，一个生理畸形、心理匮乏、行为僵化、“性趣”黯然的群体，何以能够担当性教育之宏大重任？！
2010年，联合国教科文组织会同联合国艾滋病规划署、联合国人口基金、联合国儿童基金会和世界卫生组织共同发布了《国际性教育技术指导纲要》，明确提出了性教育的六大关键概念：(1)人际关系；(2)价值观、态度与技能；(3)文化、社会与权利；(4)人体发育；(5)性行为；(6)性与生殖健康。并在每一个关键概念下面列出了若干主题和要点。而这些对中国的教师来说，无疑是一些极为陌生的东西。中国的教师往往会把儿童看做被保护、被教育、被管理、被改造的对象，而独独不会把儿童看作与成人一样也是一个具有自由主体的独立人。况且教师的生活也是贫乏而又僵硬的，你让他们来给学生讲“如何防止性暴力和性虐待”、“怎样正确对待自慰”、 “为什么说性是美好的”、“如何预防怀孕、预防艾滋病”等等之类的内容，这可能吗？即便是可能，他们又懂得什么叫性暴力和性虐待、什么叫自慰、什么叫性的美好吗？
还有一个事实，我国目前中小学是没有性教育教师的编制的。即便是有了性教育教师的编制，那么在性教育的课堂上，是更开放一些好，还是更保守一些好？在一些问题上，讲多少，讲多深？术语的使用上，是模糊还是清晰？相必大家还记得那个《年轻后妈赤身裸体教子》的新闻，该篇报道出来以后曾引发了诸多的争议，大多数网友对此报道发出了质疑，且认为教育方式离奇、教育效果不实。而对于有些学校让学生直面人体、甚至是观看性爱视频的做法，笔者就更不能理解了，设若性教育只是简单到让异性之间“裸体”观摩一下就可以凑效的话，那么干脆找几个伟大的“裸模教师”来拯救中国岌岌可危的性教育状况算了！
随着人们性观念的逐渐开放，学生偷吃“禁果”的人数在不断增多，遭遇性骚扰和性暴力的事件也屡有发生，但这都不能成为叫嚣什么性教育的支撑。真正的教育是一种科学的心里疏导教育和人格教育。设若这些我们做到了，并且能够随机渗透在学生日常学习和生活的细节里,让孩子养成良好习惯，孩子就会在潜移默化中形成一种对性正确的意识或是观念，并时时提醒自己如何适时保护自己、以免受到坏人的伤害。
教育就是教育，教育做好了，社会引导环境好了，性教育也就做好了。所以对于那些在成长过程中从未接受过性教育，成为教师后也没有接受过专业训练教师来说，他们或许与学生一样，也只是一个嗷嗷待哺的群体，并非就能承担什么性教育之重任！
对下一代的教育，是一门艺术，更是一种责任。然而，由于认识的原因偏差、知识的欠缺和习惯养成等等原因，一些人总是片面地强调性教育，而没有把孩子看成是一个自然发展的人。这是极其不正确的。如何培养孩子求知、生存、合作、发展的能力，让教育走出分数的误区，这才是当前中国教育真正应当思考的问题！
艾滋病不治会早死，早治才康复 艾滋病不治会早死，早治才康复 艾滋病不治会早死，早治才康复 艾滋病不治会早死，早治才康复
 |
| 图示∶2011年5月正式出版的《中国特色医疗金鉴》登载的刘君主任及其机构事迹 |
| |
|
|
Li Jiming: Teachers no "sexual interest", sex education come from?
2011-05-15 12:54 Phoenix
Recently, in the "Chinese Science" magazine Science Lecture Hall on the disclosure of a survey, nearly half of the teachers is not clear, for school-age children, the primary responsibility for sex education in schools; a number of primary and secondary school teachers For the content of sex education is very vague, with the physiological knowledge of education instead of the opposite sex, sexual counseling; how preventive abuse, sexually transmitted diseases and AIDS prevention education is also a serious lack of security, as well as the teacher does not know a healthy and civilized concept of sex and What are the contents of sexual morality. 91.2% of the primary and secondary school teachers with the knowledge that his own is not enough, during the sex education can not be frank, generous nature, lack of education methods. ("Beijing Evening News," May 13, 2011)
And if the said sex education in schools is the main positions, sex education teachers are the main force, I am afraid no one would raise objections. But sex education but is an extremely complex social issues, teachers, how can any worthy of the negative so much? Leaving aside the other, I just want to ask a question: is not a sexuality expert teachers, their knowledge has come from?
As we all know, sex education is related to psychological, historical, cultural, anthropological, religious, ethical, legal and other multi-disciplinary knowledge of a subject, demanding teachers. As for the Chinese teachers, but often because of "high school as a teacher, the body is the norm" leading to the request always has a "Biao" in nature, thus bringing about "sex" topic as a scourge, not 'm super overstepped, but also ashamed to talk about "sex" on the "color", coupled with no uniform teaching materials and, therefore, only by psychology teachers, biology teachers or school doctor to some of the perfunctory.
Can say with certainty that the amount of teacher knowledge and merits, directly determines the success or failure of sex education in schools. The fact is, China is only the so-called teachers control the spread of knowledge only, more teachers will become the test scores of the planter and help motivation. They used to take long time to consume the lives of students, using blunt language to boost scores rose, and even had out of the earth's complex and "sacred" was arrogant, and thus become mechanical, rigid, dogmatic, rigid, more Do not say anything of the experience and nature study. It is difficult to imagine a physical deformity, psychological deprivation, behavioral rigidity, "sexual interest" groups, a sad, why can undertake the ambitious task of sex education? !
In 2010, UNESCO together with UNAIDS, the United Nations Population Fund, UNICEF and the World Health Organization issued the "Guidelines for international education technology," clearly put forward the six key concepts of sex education: (1 ) interpersonal relationships; (2) values, attitudes and skills; (3) cultural, social and rights; (4) human development; (5) sex; (6) sexual and reproductive health. A key concept in each of a number of topics listed below and the points. These teachers in China is undoubtedly some very strange things. China, as teachers often children will be protected, be educated, to be managed by transformation of the object, not only that the same children as adults is an independent body with a free person. Moreover, the lives of teachers but also the poor stiff, you let them talk to the students "how to prevent sexual violence and sexual abuse" and "How to correctly deal with masturbation," "Why sex is good," "how to prevent pregnancy, prevention AIDS ", etc. in paper, is this possible? Even if possible, they understand what sexual violence and abuse, what is masturbation, what is sex better?
There is also a fact that our current sex education teachers in primary and secondary schools are not prepared. Even with the preparation of teachers of sex education, then the sex education class, is more open to some good, some good, or more conservative? On some issues, about how much more deeply about? The use of the term is fuzzy or clear? We must also remember that phase, "the young stepmother naked Son," the news came out that the stories had caused a lot of controversy, most users report issued this challenge, and the bizarre way that education, education, the result is not real. For some schools allow students to face the human body, even the practice of watching sex video, I even can not understand, should the opposite sex simply to make between "naked" can take care to observe what effect the case, then simply find a few great "nude model teacher" to save China's precarious situation forget sex!
With the gradual opening up of ideas, the students eat "forbidden fruit" increasing the number of people, sexual harassment and sexual violence incidents also occurred frequently, but what can not be clamoring for the support of sex education. True education is a science education and character education to ease my heart. And if the those we do, and can penetrate the students were learning and the everyday details of life, let them develop good habits, the child will be in the form of a subtle sense of right or of the concept, and constantly remind ourselves how a timely manner to protect themselves in order to avoid damage by the bad guys.
Education is education, education, well, a good social environment to guide, sex education will do a good job. So for those who grow up never had sex education, as teachers have not received post-professional training for teachers and students as they may, it is just a starving population, sex education is not what you can bear the heavy responsibility!
Next generation of children, is an art, but also a responsibility. However, understanding the reasons for bias, lack of knowledge and the habits and other reasons, some people are always one-sided emphasis on sex education, not the child as a natural development of people. This is extremely incorrect. How to train a child knowledge, survival, cooperation and development capacity, so that education out of the points of misunderstanding, this is the current Chinese education really should think about!
|
